- American Physical Society Sites
- Meetings & Events
- Policy & Advocacy
- Careers In Physics
- About APS
- Become a Member
By Emily Conover
Photo: Matthew Kapust/Sanford Underground Research Facility
Researchers will use a detector inside this copper-lead shielded room to look for neutrino-less double beta decay events. The NSAC plan gives this search high priority.
To prepare for the future, nuclear scientists have united behind a plan outlining their priorities for research in the next decade. At a meeting of the Nuclear Science Advisory Committee (NSAC) on October 15, members approved the plan unanimously.
The 150-page plan makes four major recommendations for nuclear research: capitalize on recently completed and ongoing construction projects and upgrades to major facilities; develop a next-generation, U.S.-led neutrino-less double beta decay experiment that could indicate whether neutrinos are their own antiparticles; construct a high-luminosity electron ion collider; and increase funding for small- and mid-scale projects.
The committee hashed out the impact of varying funding scenarios on these projects. These goals would be achievable with yearly budget increases of 1.6% above inflation, the report indicates. But even if funding increases only at the rate of inflation, nuclear physicists say they could still meet their main objectives, although the science reach would be more limited.
The plan also highlights two initiatives that would undergird their recommendations: one to support nuclear theory research, and one to support detector and accelerator R&D.
Finally, the committee emphasized the importance of training students in nuclear science, and recommended boosting programs in that area, including the Research Experiences for Undergraduates program, the National Nuclear Physics Summer School, and fellowships for postdocs.
NSAC advises both the Department of Energy (DOE) and National Science Foundation (NSF) on basic research in the nuclear sciences. It has produced six long-term plans since 1979, with the previous plan in 2007. In April 2014, the agencies charged NSAC with creating a new report.
The current plan builds on the successes of the 2007 guidelines. An upgrade to the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility at Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility is nearly complete, and the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory received an upgrade as well. The Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB) at Michigan State University, is now under construction. The first recommendation of the report was to take full advantage of these upgraded and upcoming facilities.
Neutrino-less double beta decay experiments, the second recommendation in the report, search for a hypothetical type of radioactive decay in which two electrons are emitted without any accompanying anti-neutrinos. Discovery of such a process would indicate that the neutrino is its own antiparticle. Several current-generation experiments are preparing for the search, and hope to demonstrate technology that could be scaled up to a larger, next-generation experiment of the type endorsed by the report.
The plan’s third recommendation — an electron ion collider — would be a high-energy, high-luminosity machine that collides polarized electrons with polarized protons and ions. Construction of the collider would begin following the completion of construction on FRIB, and could be operational around the end of the 2020s. The collider would allow researchers to uncover the source of neutron spin and reach the next frontier of quantum chromodynamics by systematically studying the properties of gluons.
The fourth recommendation, to increase funding for small- and mid-scale projects, follows a period with decreased investment in such efforts, as a result of intense focus on large undertakings like FRIB, said NSAC chair Donald Geesaman, a physicist at Argonne National Laboratory. Now, “we have to have projects at a number of scales,” he said in a presentation at the meeting.
The plan passed easily, without any significant critique or questions from the committee or the audience, and the vote was unanimous, an indication of what Geesaman described as broad engagement from the nuclear physics community. Difficult decisions had already been worked out in the committee, said Geesaman, leading to “a lot of consensus” on the most important priorities. To produce the report, NSAC created a dedicated working group that held a series of town meetings and produced white papers. “The key thing, in my mind, is actually going through real budget scenarios,” he added.
DOE and NSF officials also approved of the NSAC report. “I think it’s an outstanding plan. I think it builds on the past and looks toward a very vigorous future,” said Patricia Dehmer, acting director of DOE’s Office of Science, in a presentation at the meeting. Fleming Crim, assistant director of NSF’s Directorate of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, commended nuclear scientists for coming together to set goals. “Plans like this are successful when they really engage the community,” he said.
©1995 - 2021, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
APS encourages the redistribution of the materials included in this newspaper provided that attribution to the source is noted and the materials are not truncated or changed.
Editor: David Voss
Staff Science Writer: Emily Conover
Contributing Correspondent: Alaina G. Levine
Art Director and Special Publications Manager: Kerry G. Johnson
Publication Designer and Production: Nancy Bennett-Karasik