American Physical Society
American Physical Society Sites|APS|Journals|PhysicsCentral|Physics
 
Login| Become a Member|Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals
    • APS News
    • Physics
    • Physics Today
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Meeting Presentations
    • Virtual Press Rooms
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics Outreach
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellows
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Fellowships & Fellows
    • Contact APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Physics Jobs
    • Becoming a Physicist
    • Career Guidance
    • Statistical Data
  • About APS
    • Mission Statement
    • Society Governance
    • Society History
    • Social Media
    • Donate to APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K - 8
    • High School
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
  • International Affairs
  • Physics Outreach
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellows

Email Email   Print Print     Share Share
 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Fabrication, Falsification, and Plagiarism Discussion

Fabrication, Falsification, and Plagiarism Discussion

Mistakes can certainly occur in drafting a paper, and it’s unwise to make accusations before knowing the full story. If you have questions, as a coauthor of the paper, it is reasonable for you to be satisfied that the revised paper is complete and accurate. 

You can certainly ask your coworker for clarification without accusing him of altering the original data. If you are worried that he will feel accused in any case, this would also be a question for your mutual advisor. As the PI for this research project (and likely as someone who has refereed many papers as well), your advisor might be in the best position to judge whether the explanation is appropriate.

Gray arrow Submit a Comment (APS Members Only)

Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Terms of Use | Site Map

Follow APS: Feeds  Twitter  Facebook  LinkedIn  Google Plus  Wordpress  YouTube  AddThis

© 2013 American Physical Society