APS News

December 2010 (Volume 19, Number 11)

Physicist Loses Congressional Race in Arizona

By Alaina G. Levine

If it really does take a rocket scientist to fix our problems in the federal government, Arizona voters may not agree. In the race in Arizona’s 7th  Congressional District between incumbent Democrat Raúl M. Grijalva, and Republican Ruth McClung, the unofficial tally was clearly in favor of Grijalva. There were 78,419, or 50.04%, of the votes cast for the Co-Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, vs. 69,386, or 44.27%, for McClung, who works as a physicist for a government contractor. The outcome is almost certain, although at press time some ballots were still being counted.

McClung, who had never run for office before this race, found the experience eye-opening. “It’s very different from science and engineering,” she said. “2 plus 2 no longer equal 4” Surprises included the number of lawsuits that are filed against candidates. Although McClung said she was never sued personally, she did receive “cease and desist orders” and had to hire an attorney.

But she was encouraged by speaking with people on the trail, and by the response she received from the scientific community. “Most people were excited that someone with a science background would run for political office,” she said. The President of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) contacted McClung to express support, and the Arizona Technology Council (ATC), a private, non-profit trade and advocacy association, supported her campaign. “I was the first federal candidate that they had ever endorsed,” McClung noted. Steven G. Zylstra, President and CEO of ATC, characterized this decision as opportunistic. “She represented the kind of candidate who would represent the technology industry in Congress,” he said. “She’s a physicist, works for Raytheon, and understands the unique challenges of this industry. And it looked like she actually had a chance [to win] so it was a good time to weigh in on that campaign.”

McClung was pleased that “many people saw my science background as a plus.” Responding to questions from the public “was hard sometimes because people often want a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer, but often I had to give more nuanced answers because unless you know all the variables, many things can be more gray,” she explained.

“Running for office was a rewarding experience,” she concluded. “It may not be for everyone, but we need a good representative government and people with a science background certainly can offer a great deal to help our country… I can see myself running again.  It was extremely hard at times, but if you don’t get involved, you can’t make a difference.”

©, 2010, Alaina G. Levine.


©1995 - 2017, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
APS encourages the redistribution of the materials included in this newspaper provided that attribution to the source is noted and the materials are not truncated or changed.

Editor: Alan Chodos

December 2010 (Volume 19, Number 11)

Table of Contents

APS News Archives

Contact APS News Editor


Articles in this Issue
Budget Cuts Threaten Physics Programs
Texas-Size March Meeting Heads for Dallas
PhysicsCentral’s New Look Enhances Content Access
Advocates Worry over Science Funding
APS Launches Webinar Series
Physicist Loses Congressional Race in Arizona
Laser’s 50th Birthday Sparks Yearlong Outreach Effort
APS Section Meeting Briefs
APS Plasma, Nuclear, and Laser Divisions Hold Fall Meetings
Letters to the Editor
The Back Page
Members in the Media
This Month in Physics History
Washington Dispatch
Profiles in Versatility
International News