American Physical Society
American Physical Society Sites|APS|Journals|PhysicsCentral|Physics
 
Login| Become a Member|Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals
    • APS News
    • Physics
    • Physics Today
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Meeting Presentations
    • Virtual Press Rooms
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics Outreach
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellows
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Fellowships & Fellows
    • Contact APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Physics Jobs
    • Becoming a Physicist
    • Career Guidance
    • Statistical Data
  • About APS
    • Mission Statement
    • Society Governance
    • Society History
    • Social Media
    • Donate to APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
Publications
  • Journals
  • APS News
    • Issue Archives
    • Features Archives
    • Announcements
    • Contact APS News
  • Physics
  • Physics Today
  • Capitol Hill Quarterly
  • Other APS Publications
  • Reciprocal Society Newsletters

Email Email   Print Print     Share Share
 
Home   |   Publications   |   APS News   |   June 2006 (Volume 15, Number 6)   |   Lorentz Invariance Still Stands

Lorentz Invariance Still Stands

Lorentz invariance expresses the proposition that the laws of physics are the same for different observers, for example, an observer at rest on Earth or one who is rotated through some angle, or traveling at a constant speed relative to the observer at rest. It is the pillar of Einstein’s theory of special relativity, and every experiment conducted to date has verified it. But if new, far more sensitive experiments could detect a very faint field pervading the cosmos, one that exerts a force on electron spin, that would topple Lorentz invariance.

Fortunately for fans of Einstein and relativity, a new experiment at the University of Washington sought just such an anomalous field and came up empty-handed, even at an unprecedented energy scale of 10-21, according to results presented at the APS April Meeting in Dallas. This is the most stringent search to date (by a factor of 100) for violations of Lorentz invariance involving electrons.

Eric Adelberger’s UW group is conducting an ongoing battery of tests carried out with a flexible and sophisticated torsion-balance apparatus. In 2000, they were one of three separate research groups to measure the gravitational constant (“Big G”) to the greatest precision to date, although the various measurements didn’t agree with each other.

Most recently, they set out to test Lorentz invariance with a torsion pendulum, in hopes that even a slight departure from expected behavior in spacetime might signal an interesting new phase in our understanding of the universe. According to Clare Cramer, a member of Adelberger’s research group, in this particular experiment, the apparatus involved a pendulum made of blocks whose magnetism arises from both the orbital motion of an electron around its nucleus and from the intrinsic spin of the electron itself.

By carefully choosing and arranging the blocks, they can create an assembly that has zero magnetization and yet still has an overall nonzero electron spin. Cramer calls this condition a “spin dipole,” and likens it to the case of an electric dipole, which has zero net charge, yet possesses a net electric field because of a displaced arrangement of positive and negative charge. The existence of a preferred-direction, Lorentz-violating, spin-related force would have shown up as a subtle mode in the rotation of the pendulum. The conclusion: any such "quasi-magnetic" field would have to be weaker than about a femto-gauss.

They are also searching for evidence of extra dimensions in the form of departures from Newtonian gravity–such as the inverse-square dependence–at size scales of tens of microns. While the group did find some strange results at a measurement scale of about 70 microns, Adelberger conceded this was most likely due to an experimental artifact.

A portion of the above article appeared in Physics News Update Number 775.



A Page Set Navigation element will display here when the current page becomes part of a Page Set

©1995 - 2013, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
APS encourages the redistribution of the materials included in this newspaper provided that attribution to the source is noted and the materials are not truncated or changed.

Editor: Alan Chodos
Associate Editor: Jennifer Ouellette
Staff Writer: Ernie Tretkoff
Special Publications Manager: Kerry G. Johnson
Design and Production: Amera Jones
Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Terms of Use | Site Map

Follow APS: Feeds  Twitter  Facebook  LinkedIn  Google Plus  Wordpress  YouTube  AddThis

© 2013 American Physical Society