American Physical Society
APS SitesAPSJournalsPhysicsCentralPhysicsFocus
 
Become a Member | Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics Today
    • Physical Review Focus
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Archived Multimedia Presentations
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics for All
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellowships
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Inside APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Employment Opportunities
    • Student Guidance
    • Educator Guidance
    • Career Guidance
  • About APS
    • History & Vision
    • Society Governance
    • Support APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
    • Visit Us
Publications
  • Journals of the American Physical Society
  • APS News
    • Issue Archives
    • Features Archives
    • Announcements
  • Physics Today
  • Physical Review Focus
  • Capitol Hill Quarterly
  • Other APS Publications
  • Reciprocal Society Newsletters

 
Home   |   Publications   |   APS News   |   October 2003 (Volume 12, Number 10)   |   Zero Gravity: The Lighter Side of Science

Zero Gravity: The Lighter Side of Science

Email | Print

Scientists Prove Kansas Flatter than a Pancake

pancake-kansas

pancake
While driving across the American Midwest, it is common to hear travelers remark, "This state is as flat as a pancake." To scientists at Texas State University and Arizona State University, respectively, this adage seems to qualitatively capture some characteristic of a topographic geodetic survey.

The obvious question "How flat is a pancake" sparked their analytical interest, and they set out to find the "flatness" of both a pancake and one particular state: Kansas.

Their findings have been published in the Annals of Improbable Research (AIR) [See link at end.]

Kansans have always fondly claimed that their state, in the heart of America's Great Plains, is "as flat as a pancake." Using modern analytical techniques, geographers Mark Fonstad, William Pugatch, and Brandon Vogt measured the flatness of Kansas, and contrasted it with the flatness of a pancake.

Their results demonstrate that, of the two, Kansas is considerably flatter. [It may also be of significance that the town of Liberal, Kansas, hosts the annual "International Pancake Day" festival.]

Barring the acquisition of either a Kansas-sized pancake or a pancake-sized Kansas, mathematical techniques were needed to do a proper comparison.

The scientists compared the two surfaces?Kansas and the pancake?using special geographic information software. Topographic elevation data for Kansas was taken from a digital scale model prepared by the United States Geological Survey.

The pancake was purchased from an International House of Pancakes. "The importance of this research dictated that we not be daunted by the 'No Food or Drink' sign posted in the microscopy room," write the authors.

One common method of quantifying "flatness" in geodesy is the "flattening" ratio. The length of an ellipse's (or arc's) semimajor axis (a) is compared with its measured semiminor axis (b) using the formula for flattening. A perfectly flat surface will have a flattening of one, whereas an ellipsoid with equal axis lengths will have no flattening, and f will equal zero. For example, the earth is slightly flattened at the poles due to the earth 's rotation, making its semimajor axis slightly longer than its semiminor axis, giving a global f of 0.00335.

How flat is Kansas, compared to a pancake? Fonstad, Pugatch, and Vogt explain that:
Mathematically, a value of 1.000 would indicate perfect, platonic flatness. The calculated flatness of the pancake transect is approximately 0.957, which is pretty flat, but far from perfectly flat.

After many hours of programming work, we were able to estimate that Kansas's flatness is approximately 0.9997. That degree of flatness might be described, mathematically, as "damn flat."

For the complete online article, see http://www.improbable.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v9i3/kansas.html


©1995 - 2008, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY
APS encourages the redistribution of the materials included in this newspaper provided that attribution to the source is noted and the materials are not truncated or changed.

Editor: Alan Chodos
Associate Editor: Jennifer Ouellette
Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Privacy | Site Map
    © 2008 American Physical Society