American Physical Society
American Physical Society Sites|APS|Journals|PhysicsCentral|Physics
 
Login| Become a Member|Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics
    • Physics Today
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Meeting Presentations
    • Virtual Press Rooms
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics Outreach
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellows
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Fellowships & Fellows
    • Contact APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Physics Jobs
    • Becoming a Physicist
    • Career Guidance
    • Physics Careers Statistical Data
  • About APS
    • Mission Statement
    • Society Governance
    • Society History
    • Donate to APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K - 8
    • High School
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
  • International Affairs
  • Physics Outreach
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellows

Email Email   Print Print     Share Share
 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Errata in Previous Research Discussion

Errata in Previous Research Discussion

First, it is essential that the former postdoc and the student publish an erratum. It would be inappropriate for the new student to be a co-author of the erratum, but when the error is completely understood, he, and perhaps the advisor, could publish a paper about the physical phenomena that were overlooked earlier. The student should get an acknowledgment in the erratum, but should be consoled by the fact that a new paper might come out of the corrected results.

Gray arrow Submit a Comment (APS Members Only)

Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Terms of Use | Site Map

Follow APS: Feeds Facebook LinkedIn Wordpress Twitter Google Plus YouTube

© 2013 American Physical Society