American Physical Society
American Physical Society Sites|APS|Journals|PhysicsCentral|Physics
 
Login| Become a Member|Contact Us
  • Publications
    • Journals of the American Physical Society
    • APS News
    • Physics
    • Physics Today
    • Capitol Hill Quarterly
    • Other APS Publications
    • Reciprocal Society Newsletters
  • Meetings & Events
    • March Meeting
    • April Meeting
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Abstract Submission
    • Archives of the Bulletin of the American Physical Society
    • Policies & Guidelines
    • Meeting Presentations
    • Virtual Press Rooms
  • Programs
    • Education
    • International Affairs
    • Physics Outreach
    • Women in Physics
    • Minorities in Physics
    • Prizes, Awards & Fellows
  • Membership
    • Join APS
    • Renew Membership
    • Member Directory
    • My Member Profile
    • Member Services
    • APS Units
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Issues
    • Reports & Studies
    • APS Statements
    • Advocacy Tools
    • Advocacy Resources
    • Fellowships & Fellows
    • Contact APS Public Affairs
  • Careers In Physics
    • Physics Jobs
    • Becoming a Physicist
    • Career Guidance
    • Physics Careers Statistical Data
  • About APS
    • Mission Statement
    • Society Governance
    • Society History
    • Donate to APS
    • APS Jobs
    • Contact Us
Programs
  • Education
    • Why Study Physics?
    • K - 8
    • High School
    • Undergraduate
    • Graduate
    • Education Conferences
    • Ethics Case Studies
  • International Affairs
  • Physics Outreach
  • Women in Physics
  • Minorities in Physics
  • Prizes, Awards & Fellows

 
Home   |   Programs   |   Education   |   Ethics Case Studies   |   Publication Practices   |   Dual Submissions

Dual Submissions

Publication Practices

Discussion of the Problem

A newly minted Ph.D. has taken up a position at a government laboratory. His early work has been extremely successful, and on the suggestion of his group leader, he put together a manuscript describing their joint work, and submit it for publication in a high-impact journal. The young scientist was the submitting author.


Some weeks later his supervisor came to him and told him to submit the same manuscript to a specialized journal where the time to publication might be a lot shorter, and the potential refereeing gauntlet would likely be less of a hassle. The supervisor suggested that they could withdraw their manuscript from the extra journal if the other accepted it sooner.


Questions

  • What should the young scientist do?
  • If the scientist follows his supervisor's advice, what should the editors do?

Gray arrow Dual Submissions Discussion

Home | APS Jobs | Media Center | Terms of Use | Site Map

Follow APS: Feeds Facebook LinkedIn Wordpress Twitter Google Plus YouTube

© 2013 American Physical Society